The Main Criteria in the Choice of Medium of Articulation

Communication is defined as the transfer of meaning (Eunson, 20062). The cognitive content to be conveyed, the urgency of the heart and soul, the effect on the receiver and so forthteradetermine the choice of the remove of communicating. This essay shall argue that this is the most important criteria, in channel determination. Right Preference Key to Effectiveness New inventions have facilitated locomote of communication. Ironically though, Priestleys Paradox explains that, the more we advance our means of communication, the slight we communicate (Priestley 1957, as cited in Eunson, 20064).Hence, for effective communication the important things to be considered whitethorn be the message and effect (Lasswells ride, 1948, as cited in Eunson, 20067). The latter i. e. the effect of the message on the receiver, depends on which mode of communication is preferred over which and will make the difference between communicating effectively and ordinarily. Especially, if the communica tion is meant for a limited audience, like the staff of peerless particular department of an office, or to a few sales- staff with contrary performance etc.For example, in a Human Resource Department in an office, with a HR Manager, and five assistants, communication is possible with his staff d sensation direct face-to-face communication, or through memos, or netmail notifications etc. The smart manager will choose the medium, depending on the importance of the message and the impact it should effect. He may convey routine Monthly set notices by pasting them on the Department Bulletin board, and further sending a copy of the message to each staff through the netmail as a follow up.But, he may prefer to send the single(a)s Performance Assessment Report through individual e-mail and then a one-to-one review. This orientation course is exercised to enhance effective communication. The brilliance of media (Daft and Lengel, 1986) effected by direct face-to-face communication is preferred to the e-mail channel, which is less effective than the chosen one. Conclusion Making the right preference in the choice of media to communicate is vital to being effective. Since effectiveness is the mention element in any communication, it is clear that the right choices and preferences will range to success.Bibliography Daft, R. L. and R. H. Lengel, (1986) Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Sci. , 32, 5, 554571. Can too be view at website Eunson, Baden, (2006). Communication Today, in Communicating in the 21st Century, 1, pp. 2-18. Tutorial Response 2 Introduction The deluge of engineering science has been incapable of preventing Miscommunication. This essay will briefly explain the term and go two problems of context resulting in miscommunication, and suggest a strategy to overmaster the disturbance factor.Context, Noise and Miscommunication The Context of the communication is concerned with the following issues 1) place and Status Relationships 2) Cultural factors 3) Interpersonal Relationships 4) Time (Eunson, 00616). Communication derives its meaning from the context, beneath which it takes place. The basic tenet of communication is, to send as well as receive and is said to authorize, only when understanding is achieved. This fails, when there is non-cooperation between one or more of the parties and results in miscommunication.This can be deduced as the noise in the Sender-Message-Receiver (SMR) and the Shannon-Weaver model of communication (1999, as cited in Eunson 20068) because it ignores the importance of context, i. e. situational, social, ethnic, etc. Context can be interpreted differently, by the receiver, according to 1) the heathenish differences, 2) status differences between the former and the receiver and the sender. For example, using gestures and direct eye-contact is a vital part of Western conversation however, in the Native American cultures, looking direct ly into the eyes of elders is disrespectful, and gestures are hardly used.Miscommunication may occur when a young American salesman tries to convince an elderly Native American of his product, due to differing cultural contexts. An example of problems arising from the power status differences A $ degree Celsius rise in salary for performance, may impact positively on a low-level employee in the factory while the Manager of the payoff is apt to be disgruntled by the same amount. The Quinn, Hildebrandt, Rogers, & Thompson, (1991) (cited in Eunson 200616) model helps effectively weed out the noise factor, by strategicalally and judiciously preferring the channel of communication.For example, to solve problem 1 of miscorporate trust arising from contextual cultural differences, modification of the sales strategy, by adopting a combination of informational communication and relational-communication may help. This will 1) provide the facts to the receiver, 2) win his trust a sale may ef fect. And in proble 2, it is possible to build on the existing on trust level of the manager by a) improving relational communication, b) stimulating argufy by using transformational communication, to explain that money is not the only end-goal in life. ConlcusionThe study of various types of communication can help in strategic solutions to problems. Bibliography Eunson, Baden, (2006). Communication Today, Communicating in the 21st Century. , 1, pp. 2-18. Grice, H. P. , (1975), Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds. , Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Academic Press, pp. 41-58 Quinn, R. E. , Hildebrandt, H. W. , Rogers, P. S. , & Thompson, M. P. (1991). A competing values framework for analyzing presentational communication in management contexts. The Journal of Business Communication, 28, 213-232.