Harm Reduction: Needle Exchange

HARM REDUCTION : NEEDLE EXCHANGEIntroductionNeedle transposition programs ar appropriate with a mis spend reduction approach to intravenous medicament use management . Intravenous medicine use is discreet for the spread of infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV , hepatitis B and hepatitis C . A aboutwhat divisive rude(a) policy chevy switch programs are intended to view as the spread of infectious diseases by supplying the medicate injecting kingdom with sterile hassles and injecting equipment . This takes a f behaveual approach to the issue and considers the study that supports and opposes the prostitute reduction approach . It should be noted that this considers all in all chevvy exchange programs and not the highly controversial of labored injecting rooms . The concludes by offe ring a personal take in of the issue , based on the evidence presentedPros of needle exchange programsReducing the spread of infectious diseaseInfectious diseases including HIV and hepatitis are prevalent in intravenous dose users because of high risk injecting pr toyices including sharing needles and administering injections in an unsterile environment . The Center for Disease Control (CDC , the National extend of Health (NIH ) and the World Health Organization (WHO endorse needle exchange programs because they have been shown to reduce high risk injecting behaviors by up to 74 (World Health Organization 2004 . The reduction in high risk injection behaviors as a carousel of needle exchange programs is the trail reason that in Australia mingled with 1991 and 2000 , more or less 25 ,000 impertinent cases of HIV and 21 ,000 bare-ass cases of hepatitis C were prevented (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005 . Such significant public wellness benefits are the principal r eason needle exchange programs are back up ! by governments in countries including Australia , Brazil , Canada , the Netherlands and the United KingdomProviding access to health and neighborly servicesA second advantage of needle exchange programs is that they act as gateways to traditional medical treatments for drug dependence for some clients . Prior to participating in needle exchange programs , a high proportion of drug-injecting clients have never been in make full with health or companionable services . Studies have shown that sore injectors are more likely to enter rehabilitation programs compared to injectors whose drug use has been long-term (Hacker et al , 2005 . Providing exposure to health and social services early in an intravenous drug user s substance abuse history is another linchpin in the argument for needle exchange programsArguments against harm minimisationEncouraging drug useDetractors of the harm reduction approach argue that needle exchange programs and facilities actively promote drug use by providing drug injecting equipment . It is as well argued that needle exchange facilities create a skillful clash spot for intravenous drug users and contribute to strengthen the social net incomes of users , thereby increasing the prevalence of intravenous drug use (Small , Palepu Tyndall , 2006 . The weight of scientific evidence suggests that these arguments are fallacious and that needle exchange programs do not countenance social network formation and do not maturation recruitment of injecting drug users (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005Represent a weakening of anti-drug policy...If you want to feel a extensive essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper